Who is Keith Kuder?
  • Home
  • About Keith Kuder
  • Resume
  • Contact

BYU Censors American Artwork for Being Too Conservative

4/25/2011

1 Comment

 
It was very sad day for Jon McNaughton to have to write this.  Jon McNaughton a graduate of BYU and has many friends that work at the University.  After recent events he has had to let the public know why he have chosen to pull all his art from the BYU Bookstore.


 Jon McNaughton sent this letter to the BYU Daily Universe:

I have a simple question for BYU…what in the heck is going on over there?!  I am an artist who has sold his work at the BYU Bookstore for many years.  But in light of recent events, I cannot in good conscious show my art there any longer.

A couple of years ago I decided to paint a picture that takes a stand for something that matters to me and to many Americans.  The title of the picture is “One Nation Under God.” It depicts Christ standing among many patriots of the past while holding the US Constitution.

Just as our country is divided now on the issues, so goes this painting.  It has been extremely popular at the BYU Bookstore, but despite its success, it was pulled from the store recently because the Vice President over the Bookstore was “uncomfortable” with the painting.  It was actually pulled down last November, but was put back up immediately after Channel Two News showed up suddenly to do a story on possible censorship at BYU.  Why is this painting, which is supported by church doctrine, (D&C 101:80) such a taboo image to display at BYU?  Why censor a painting like this?  Is it pornographic? Does it incite civil unrest? No.  Go look around the bookstore, you’ll find far more provocative political books than my paintings.  The problem in our country today is that many Americans won’t stand up for something if it makes them “uncomfortable.”

Events leading to the censorship of One Nation Under God at the BYU Bookstore
1.    BYU Art Department Manager, Val Ugolini, suddenly resigns over issues regarding “One Nation Under God.”
2.    Bookstore pulled down Jon McNaughton paintings in November of 2010.  One faculty member objected to the painting, felt that it should not hang unless an alternative liberal painting also hung.
3.    CBS Utah Channel Two News does a story on this incident and BYU receives hundreds of phone calls and e-mails.  Dave Hunt stops Daily Universe from running a story on the incident. http://connect2utah.com/search-fulltext?nxd_id=114716
4.    Private meetings held.  Jon McNaughton is asked to not talk with the press, they claim all this was a misunderstanding, apologies given and good faith agreement offered. All was good again.  (BYU Bookstore Director Roger Reynolds, BYU Assistant VP Dave Hunt)
5.    Bryan Evans BYU Administrative Vice President cancels Jon McNaughton invitation to speak at BYU OPAC Conference because he was “uncomfortable” with him presenting about One Nation Under God.
6.    Suddenly told April 18, 2011 by the BYU Bookstore managers that the “Presidential Committee” had decided back in December, weeks before the agreement with Bookstore director, to take down the One Nation Under God but had not taken action. But now the picture will no longer be hung.
7.    After it is announced that art would not be hung, BYU Bookstore Director denies existence of Presidential committee and says it is a bookstore decision.  Jon McNaughton feels that the January agreement with Bookstore Director was deceptive.
8.    April 21,2011, Jon McNaughton decides to pull out the rest of his artwork due to lack of trust with BYU Bookstore and the BYU Administration.

Click here to view the painting:
http://www.mcnaughtonart.com/artwork/view_zoom/?artpiece_id=353

 Jon McNaughton sent President Samuelson the following letter after his invitation to speak at the BYU OPAC Conference last March was cancelled:“

Has Liberalism so infected this university that speakers can be invited to speak about the truths of Darwinism, but a simple artist who wishes to speak about the Constitution and its importance in America is too controversial?   I am very troubled and would appreciate an explanation.”

His response included, “Consequently, they have concluded that their conference is not the proper forum for such a presentation and they have the support of the BYU administration. While we believe your accusations about “Liberalism” at BYU are unfounded and unsupported in fact, (emphasis added)

Although BYU is undoubtedly a conservative school to deny any Liberalism exists is astonishing.  Go to the following links:

Darwinism Conference at BYU: http://sciencebysteve.net/?p=654

BYU CollegeDemocrats http://byudemocrats.org/

BYU professor Bill Bradshaw on the Biological Origins of homosexuality http://mormonstories.org/?p=1158

A BYU Student blogs about her experience in a lecture on Evolution in a BYU class: http://godlessatbyu.blogspot.com/2010/10/evolution-debate-at-byu.html

Jon McNaughton thinks that a University like BYU should discuss all ideas as long as they don’t go against anything contrary to the honor code.  But to deny that Liberalism exists at BYU is not true.  

Jon McNaughton believe's that the source of the censoring of his painting ONUG is that BYU does not want to offend the liberals on campus.  Why is it that the complaints of a few angry liberals determine what the rest are allowed to look at?  Is this Washington D.C. or BYU?  

Please share this news with your friends. God Bless you all!
Picture
Please Like the Jon McNaughton Facebook Page!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jon-McNaughton/157211518652

Picture
If your on Twitter please Follow him!
http://twitter.com/#!/mcnaughtonart

Picture
1 Comment
Jay Purser
4/26/2011 03:18:51 am

I actually agree (wholeheartedly) with John McNaughton's view and concerns about where this country is headed. We are probably very, very close on political beliefs. Regardless, I really think his paintings are very poorly done. Both as art and as commentary. Do I think they should be "censored" on political content? Of course not, and I really wonder if they are, or if this is the primary reason behind the removal? He claims they are the best sellers. I don't know if I believe that...if so then I think that is a sad commentary on taste of those who go to the bookstore. Check out the Carl Bloch exhibit. His painting actually are MORE inspiring, when seen in person (dark subject matter or not). John's painting are (if I may be so frank) horribly overworked, and unispiring at the paint level IMO. The individuals look like they were painted individually...the lighting, size and everything is not proportionate to the whole group. The park bench in one of his paintings is so out of perspective it hurts to look at. The backgrounds in several of his paintings appear to be a bored afterthought that he quickly put in as he was so caught up in getting every last one of those characters in there. Look at the hollywood tycoon. His contrast and coloring looks like he was pasted in separately...like he shot (or collected) the reference photos and just clumsily copied each one in. I know this will tick some people off...but it is possible that BYU pulled it because it was just a bad idea executed very poorly? It seems to be little about the painting and all about the commentary. It bugs me as a conservative because I think it actually might hurt the cause and insidiously promote J. McNaughton with this big "controversy" when the reasons behind it’s removal might not be as black and white as they been made out to be. Censorship itself is a dangerous claim. You might be accused of it when you are just trying to exercise your idea of good art or good taste. I feel sorry for BYU if that was the case. I remember a similar artist with terrible pencil drawings in the BYU bookstore when I was there. They were religious, but just awfully drawn. I know they sold well, but I thought they were a disservice if that was the ONLY reason they were there. Certainly people have a right to purchase John or any artwork they want, but does the BYU bookstore (or Des book or wherever) have the right to purge crappy art from the store? Crappy is obviously my opinion. I am sure yours will differ, but the people who head up such stores do have to make such assessments, even if the art might make a buck or makes a political statement. I don't know. This may not be the case at all. Maybe it was a conspiracy of political correctness...but keep your minds open that it might have been several individuals who saw what I saw. Really bad art.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2017
    October 2014
    May 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    October 2011
    July 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    February 2011
    November 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2009


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.