The World-renowned physicist and author Stephen Hawking has joined Facebook. Mr. Hawkings is best known for his work on gravitational singularities and black hole radiation. Here is my explanation of the gravitational singularities that apply in the social media universe. First you should to consider how the social networking Universe works. This is always about the gravity of the information you’re passing along. Gravity is influence, context, and facts. Next you need to apply the rules of adding extra gravity to be just right enough to experience a big bang, similar to how the planet earth began. The perfect amount of gravity is still just a fraction of a second sending the information out by an unbelievable amount of incredible speed. If I were to give you an actual time table I would say it needs to spread out in less than a millionth, of a millionth, of a millionth, of a millionth of a second. Yes social networking information can flow that fast. For the record that is faster than the speed of light, which does break one of the laws of physics. Even school children know you can’t go faster than the speed of the light, but there is a loop hole to this. Nothing can go faster than light, nothing meaning open space. Yes I realize this will give even scientists headaches but social networking is meant to be fast and efficient.  So this speed is called Planck time. This is how fast social networking is meant to be and instruments such as Facebook has made this possible. To understand how Planck time works there is more units in Planck time in one second since the big earth bang, yes the math is mind blowing. This time period is so small that human intuition goes out the window. If even a person were to look at their watch than it would be a billion, billion, billion, billion, billion Planck times. The exploding mass of information traveling faster than the speed of light as we know it, is how social networking in the Universe works.

A fraction of the second after the information is put out in the World Wide Web the information can sit in the palm of your hand via phone applications, email, and text. But in another tiny fraction of a second it expands to others around the earth and moving faster than the speed the light it grows larger than our solar system and still is a ranging storm of information traveling in our social networking Universe. Social Networking information is more violent than anything you could experience in the Universe today. Even the interior of the Sun is more calm and serene than how social networking works. The raw energy of the explosion of the internet transforms information to sub atomic particles, which is the first matter of the Universe. This conversion of matter to energy was predicted by Albert Einstein. This is known even to children as E=MC2. This illustrates how the big impact of Albert Einstein is involved with how fast destruction can travel. A similar depiction is with the discovery of destruction traveling via an Atomic Bomb explosion. In just a fraction of a second after the big bang the building blocks of social networking the explanation begins to take shape. But this first matter of atoms or earlier stages of sub atomic particles must be sent via a stable rate. The extreme nature of society and communication energizes the information. This races the information to travel at incredible speeds. It’s pure chaos. Eventually things calms down and people cool down and read the facts of the information. All of this is happening in fractions of a second into people’s finger tips.

But this is when the big bang of social networking in the Universe is traveling into a critical stage of a titanic battle. The one thing that can destroy the information before it even gets started, Antimatter. From the smallest rock to the largest star in the Universe there is always Antimatter. This was created by the pure energy of the big bang. Einstein’s theory was that energy transforms into matter and matter can transform into energy. We do social networking with electronic tools similar to a Hadron Collider. For a split second we submit turbo charged communication and human movements to change the human thought process similar to how a Hadron Collider is functioning with antimatter. So the question arises, what communication and pure energy was sent to us from the beginning of time? Where do we come from?

If we look at how matter works we see matter has a positive charge and locks arms with its enemy antimatter that has a negative charge. The fate of communication lies in the balance to these two. This is fair and balanced. There would be nothing interesting if there was not opposition in communication. But there must always be a champion. So just like a social networking game of ‘risk’ the side with the most matter wins. That is where survival of the fittest relies upon. The side that has more information flowing causing people to take side with them and will win the hearts and minds in Nations, Communities, and Families.

Social Networking in the Universe with technology isn’t very old and is still a strange thing for some. Only a decade ago most people would knock on a neighbor’s door and share information face to face verses sending a text. Some don’t tweet or know what a tweet is. But now all this is beginning to change as we see how everyone is becoming more wired to the social networking universe with technology. More and more cell phones are being distributed in light years in size compared to home phones being the only source for phone fifteen years ago. Even home phones are being converted to use new technology such as VOIP; voice over the Internet. The day will come where households will no longer accept paper mail and the postal office will just regulate your email data servers and your home address will be your internet IP address. The young social networking universe is currently having to cool down to slow down enough to allow the older generations to catch up. This period may take about 20 years in my prediction. When this happens, the billions on planet earth will all be plugged in to the World Wide Web. To capture the critical of images of the temperature of our planet earth the United States launched a satellite back in 1989 called the Cosmic Background Explorer. These first images were called the “face of God”. If we do the same but check who has internet access across the planet, earth, would we still call these images the “face of God”? I say yes! These heat maps of the planet earth via internet access would show who and what is communicating more, and where, and how it isn’t. These are the fluctuations that created all of us humans to be alive today. So why not keep communicating? As with astronomy, Stars in the Universe allow galaxy’s to grow in majestic beautiful fashion. Planets circle the Stars and I would compare that to information. It’s a common wish of great minds that all information in Nations and Communities keep flowing so they may continue to grow in majestic beautiful fashion. Any Nations of Communities seeking to hide or stop free flowing information do so at their own self-destruction. So I ask what or who are the Stars that will keep spreading the messages of the “face of God” to you?

I say social networking in the Universe is infinite and will continue to only grow. New communication tools will eventually expand so large that we will change humanities communication in a run-away mode that will push all us. Figuring out how this might all change is a mystery as the Universe itself. If it self destructs it might trigger another big bang in communication. Maybe this has already happened and this is never ending. Some might say that this occurred with the death of copper telecommunication. But everything we enjoy in communication never really began by Mark Zuckerberg founding Facebook in his dorm room at Harvard University, but over fourteen billion years ago. Everything started with the big bang that contains the answers to our greatest questions about our past, future, and present with social networking in the Universe. 

Regards,

www.KeithKuder.com/facebook.html 
www.KeithKuder.com/googleplus.html
www.KeithKuder.com/twitter.html  
www.KeithKuder.com  

The 26-page Amnesty International report “outlines some of the human rights abuses and other policing failures” that were observed by a delegation that was sent to Ferguson on Aug. 14.

A spokesman for the St. Louis County Police Department said they “had one mission, and that was the preservation of life.” Yes, where do we draw the line for preservation of life and violating human rights? 

Here are some of the alleged human right abuses detailed in the report:

The report mentions several times police fired tear gas at protesters, including one instance (p. 13) during which “it appeared that flash bangs and tear gas were thrown directly in front of the line of protestors, forcing” them to run down W. Florissant Ave. The report also recounts instances in which police used rubber bullets (p. 13), pepper spray (p. 12), and “long range acoustic devices” (p. 14) to disperse crowds.

The report — which lists the examples of police force in a section on “human rights concerns” — acknowledges that some looting and vandalism took place. However, it adds that the police response punished protesters and vandals alike (p. 6). It also was unclear if police gave lawful orders to disperse, the report adds (p. 12).

Officials began forcing protesters to keep moving at all times or face arrest on Aug. 18 (p. 7). It was a shift in tactics that largely worked for police — but one that also happened to be illegal.

The report criticizes the tactic on a variety of grounds, including that it was arbitrarily applied and that a “protest zone” for people to rest in was an improper solution. The report also notes that some felt the order to keep moving was designed to tire out protesters and get them to go home. Several people at the scene mentioned similar concerns to BuzzFeed News reporters as well.

The curfew was in effect Aug. 16 and 17, before the National Guard arrived (p. 7). The report argues that the curfew limited people’s rights to demonstrate peacefully, and “also the freedom of movement of the general public in Ferguson who were required to be off of the streets after midnight each night.”

The report mentions (p. 10) several instances when police at the protests were armed with semiautomatic weapons and had police dogs — both things witnessed by BuzzFeed News reporters as well. Police also were equipped with riot gear, batons, shields, and helmets, and the response served to escalate tensions at the scene, the report argues. It also recounts an instance in which an officer pointed a gun at journalists and threatened to kill them.

The report also details ways in which police restricted the media, including arresting at least 19 journalists (p. 16).

After noting that the events leading up to Brown’s death remain unclear, the report calls for a thorough investigation (p. 3). It also states that force should only be used “to save life” (p. 2), and that because he was unarmed, Brown was “unlikely to have presented a serious threat to the life of the police officer.”

The report describes a 15-minute meeting (p. 16) with Amnesty delegates and Johnson, pictured above, in the back of an unmarked police car on Aug. 21. In order to secure the meeting, delegates had to promise that media would not be included, and that they would not use social media while it was happening.

The delegates presented Johnson with a series of questions, but neither he nor a spokesperson of the Missouri Department of Public Safety — who also attended the meeting — had responded by the time the report was written.



Source: 26-page Amnesty International report

Follow me Online
www.KeithKuder.com/facebook.html 
www.KeithKuder.com/googleplus.html
www.KeithKuder.com/twitter.html  
www.KeithKuder.com  

The first role in government is protecting life. Yet police departments in America are becoming more out of control. A sad fact is that Americans are nine times more likely to be killed by a police officer than a terrorist. Americans are becoming more and more skeptical of the tactics that have led to deaths or serious injuries by cops.

The first thing that needs to be re-educated to all police, who honestly feel they are protecting and serving, is the Terry vs. Ohio case. Terry vs. Ohio the was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court for America. This case explained that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest. If a police officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

For the police protection they may perform a quick surface search of the person’s outer clothing for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is armed. This reasonable suspicion must be based on "specific and articulable facts" and not merely upon an officer's hunch. Yet too many times officers do this based on a hunch, which is against the law. This commonly permitted police action has subsequently been referred to in short as a "stop and frisk," or simply a "Terry frisk". The Terry standard has been later extended to temporary detentions of persons in vehicles, known as traffic stops.

A large growing concern for every American is why are police are pointing tasers, guns, and rifles at people without respecting reasonable suspicion or the probable cause to arrest someone. These usually turn into shootings that are most likely ruled justified to an internal investigation. But to parents, relatives, friends, co-workers, or neighbors these shootings could have been prevented if the officer, or officers, had proper training to handle the situation differently.
 
Sadly we only see on the images on the news of police pointing weapons to people exercising their manifestation of the right to freedom of assembly, association, and speech. This carelessness has caused more Americans to use their cell phones to record actions by police and upload the footage unfiltered to the internet for everyone to view in real-time. In my opinion a police officer has no right to inhibit someone from filming them or has authority to delete that footage, because that would be obviously destroying evidence. 

In conclusion, if we are innocent until proven guilty then police need to respect all rights of a living person and not push the boundaries until the Miranda rights are being mentioned.  If a person is truly a suspect then police should do all they can to ensure a person can see a Judge, and possibly a jury. 

I share my opinion based on my divine respect for everyones right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. 

Regards,

Keith Kuder
[email protected]
www.KeithKuder.com/facebook.html 
www.KeithKuder.com/googleplus.html
www.KeithKuder.com/twitter.html  
www.KeithKuder.com